logo

Battery Materials

Battery performance and safety depend on tightly controlled chemistry at surfaces, interfaces, and trace impurity levels. Battery materials are widely used across lithium-ion and emerging chemistries (project-dependent) in applications such as consumer electronics, electric vehicles, energy storage systems, and industrial power. Small variations in composition, moisture/ionic contamination, particle morphology, and surface chemistry can drive major impacts on capacity retention, impedance growth, gas generation, and cycle life.

We provide analytical testing and materials characterization for battery active materials, electrolytes (project-dependent), separators/binders, conductive additives, coatings, and failure-related residues, supporting R&D, supplier qualification, incoming QC, process monitoring, and root-cause investigations. Our multi-technique approach delivers clear, decision-ready results—especially for “what changed?” comparisons and contamination source identification.

Why Testing Matters for Battery Materials

Battery materials are sensitive to impurities and surface chemistry. Common analytical needs include:

  • Composition and stoichiometry control for consistent electrochemical performance

  • Phase identification and structural changes affecting capacity and stability

  • Trace metals and ionic contamination that drive parasitic reactions and impedance growth

  • Surface chemistry and coatings that govern interfacial behavior (CEI/SEI-related questions)

  • Moisture/volatile-related risk indicators (project-dependent)

  • Thermal stability and decomposition behavior linked to safety and gas generation (project-dependent)

  • Particles, residues, and cross-contamination across manufacturing steps

Our lab uses orthogonal methods to build an evidence-based view of what changed and why it matters.

FAQs

Yes (project-dependent). We can tailor methods based on the chemistry and required limits.

Yes—provide limits and any preferred method references, and we’ll align reporting accordingly.

Often yes, depending on matrix and limits. We’ll recommend the best method (ICP-MS, TXRF, IC) based on your requirement.

Yes (project-dependent). XPS/TOF-SIMS is commonly used for surface state and residue comparisons.

Very. A known-good lot enables faster and more defensible “what changed?” conclusions.

Most are minimally destructive, but some steps (e.g., depth profiling, certain prep) can be destructive in the analyzed area. We’ll clarify in the method plan.

Have additional questions?