GC-MS/MS
What Is GC-MS/MS?
GC-MS/MS (Gas Chromatography–Tandem Mass Spectrometry) is a powerful technique for high-confidence identification and quantification of volatile and semi-volatile organic compounds. By combining GC separation with tandem mass spectrometry (MS/MS), it delivers exceptional selectivity—making it ideal for trace-level targets in complex matrices where traditional GC-MS can suffer from interferences.
We provide GC-MS/MS testing for targeted panels, method-based quantitation, confirmation of regulated compounds, and troubleshooting investigations, supporting R&D, QC release, supplier qualification, and root-cause analysis.
What GC-MS/MS Is Used For
GC-MS/MS is widely used to quantify and confirm trace organics such as:
Residual solvents and process-related volatiles
VOCs/SVOCs in complex products
Impurities and regulated substances (project/matrix dependent)
Odor contributors and volatile markers
Additives and degradation markers that are GC-amenable
Confirmation testing when GC-MS results are ambiguous due to co-elution
Why GC-MS/MS (vs. GC-MS)?
GC-MS/MS adds an extra layer of selectivity by monitoring specific fragmentation pathways. This often enables:
Cleaner quantitation in dirty matrices (oils, polymers, surfactant systems, complex formulations)
Lower practical reporting limits for targets impacted by interference
More defensible confirmation for compliance or customer disputes
Improved confidence in “same compound / different compound” decisions across lots/suppliers
Sample Types We Support
GC-MS/MS is commonly applied to (matrix-dependent):
Solvents and liquid chemicals
Oils, fuels, lubricants, petrochemical streams
Formulated products: detergents, coatings, agrochemicals, cleaning products (project-dependent)
Polymers and plastics extracts (project-dependent)
Pharmaceutical/cosmetic-adjacent solvents and ingredients (project-dependent)
Odor investigation samples: headspace vials, swabs/extracts (project-dependent)
Common Workflows
Targeted Quantitation (Most Common)
Best for: QC release, compliance, supplier qualification
Target list defined by your spec, regulation, or risk assessment
Calibration approach selected to match accuracy needs (external, internal standard, etc.)
Reported results with QC checks and acceptance criteria (if provided)
Targeted Confirmation / Dispute Resolution
Best for: confirming identity when GC-MS is inconclusive
MS/MS confirmation of targets in the presence of co-eluting interferences
Comparison to reference materials or library/standard (when available)
Volatile Marker Comparison (“What Changed?”)
Best for: odor drift, storage changes, supplier changes
Comparative profiling focused on a defined marker set
Clear “increased/decreased/new” summary vs reference lot
Typical Applications by Industry
Agrochemicals & pesticides: residual solvents, impurity markers, odor contributors
Polymers & plastics: VOC/SVOC targets in extracts, odor/fogging markers (project-dependent)
Oil & gas / petrochemicals: hydrocarbon/volatile targets and trace contaminants (project-dependent)
Consumer products & detergents: fragrance/odor markers, regulated volatiles (project-dependent)
Pharma & cosmetics (project-dependent): residual solvent confirmation and targeted volatile impurities
Disinfection products: solvent/volatile control, stability-related volatile changes (project-dependent)
What You Receive
Target analyte table with results, units, and reporting limits
Method conditions and QC notes (calibration range, internal standards, blanks—scope-dependent)
Identification/confirmation notes (when confirmation is part of scope)
Comparison summary (if you submit reference vs suspect lots)
Practical conclusions and recommended next steps (when used for investigations)
Sample Submission Guidelines
Please provide
Target question (QC release, compliance, odor, comparison, unknown confirmation)
Sample matrix description and hazards (SDS)
Target analyte list + required limits (if available)
Lot/batch IDs and storage history (for drift investigations)
Reference/control sample whenever possible
Typical sample amounts
Liquids: 10–50 mL (more if repeats or multiple methods)
Solids/extracts (project-dependent): adequate mass/volume for prep and replicates
Headspace/odor studies: define vial count and conditions with us (project-dependent)
Packaging tips
Use airtight containers; minimize headspace for volatile-sensitive projects
Avoid permeable plastics for solvents; use compatible glass when needed
Label clearly: reference vs suspect, sampling time/location
FAQs
Can GC-MS/MS identify unknowns?
GC-MS/MS is strongest for targeted analysis. For broad unknown screening, GC-MS (full scan) and/or HRMS workflows are often more efficient. We can combine approaches if your goal is “unknown ID + confirmation.”
How do you choose between HS-GC-MS/MS and direct injection?
Headspace is preferred for volatile components and odor contributors, while direct injection is used for many solvent and semi-volatile targets. The best choice depends on matrix and targets.
Do I need standards?
For accurate quantitation, standards (or commercially available references) are typically required. If you don’t have them, we can propose a practical target list based on available standards.
Can you meet very low limits?
Often yes, depending on matrix and interference. GC-MS/MS improves selectivity, but achievable limits are still matrix-dependent. We’ll recommend the best prep and calibration strategy.
What’s the benefit of sending a reference sample?
It dramatically improves speed and confidence for comparisons and “what changed?” conclusions.
- +86 137 6417 8738
- yangxbd@gmail.com